Re: Strange PPP Server
On Wed, Nov 01, 2000 at 06:14:38PM -0600, John Hasler wrote:
> Flyitlow writes:
> > The correct way to use noauth is to place it in the peers file,
> > /etc/ppp/peers/[name].
>
> pppconfig does that.
Here's the latest, I used pppconfig, and got (some munging has taken place)...
hide-password
noauth
connect "/usr/sbin/chat -v -f /etc/chatscripts/TFN"
/dev/ttyS0
debug
115200
defaultroute
noipdefault
user <username>
remotename TFN
ipparam TFN
usepeerdns
idle 1800
When I try, I get this:
Nov 2 17:18:37 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [LCP EchoReq id=0x0 magic=0xcaf433b1]
Nov 2 17:18:37 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [PAP AuthReq id=0x1 user="<username>" password="*******"]
Nov 2 17:18:37 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [LCP EchoRep id=0x0 magic=0xd84e1b24]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [PAP AuthAck id=0x1 ""]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x1 <addr 0.0.0.0> <compress VJ 0f 01> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns3 0.0.0.0>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <deflate 15> <deflate(old#) 15> <bsd v1 15>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0xa5 <addr 0.0.0.0>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [IPCP ConfRej id=0xa5 <addr 0.0.0.0>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [proto=0x8207] 01 52 00 04
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: Unsupported protocol 0x8207 received
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [LCP ProtRej id=0x2 82 07 01 52 00 04]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [IPCP ConfRej id=0x1 <compress VJ 0f 01>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x2 <addr 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns1 0.0.0.0> <ms-dns3 0.0.0.0>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [LCP ProtRej id=0xa 80 fd 01 01 00 0f 1a 04 78 00 18 04 78 00 15 03 2f]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [IPCP ConfReq id=0xa6]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [IPCP ConfAck id=0xa6]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [IPCP ConfNak id=0x2 <addr 199.71.188.180> <ms-dns1 199.71.188.22> <ms-dns3 142.77.2.36>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [IPCP ConfReq id=0x3 <addr 199.71.188.180> <ms-dns1 199.71.188.22> <ms-dns3 142.77.2.36>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [IPCP ConfAck id=0x3 <addr 199.71.188.180> <ms-dns1 199.71.188.22> <ms-dns3 142.77.2.36>]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: Could not determine remote IP address
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [IPCP TermReq id=0x4 "Could not determine remote IP address"]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [IPCP TermAck id=0x4]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: sent [LCP TermReq id=0x3 "No network protocols running"]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: rcvd [LCP TermAck id=0x3]
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: Connection terminated.
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: Connect time 0.2 minutes.
Nov 2 17:18:38 fennywood pppd[2878]: Sent 432 bytes, received 375 bytes.
Nov 2 17:18:39 fennywood pppd[2878]: Hangup (SIGHUP)
Nov 2 17:18:39 fennywood pppd[2878]: Exit.
So it looks to me like the DNS configuration has taken place, and the
authorization also seems to have worked. What makes it not detect the
remote IP address?
Thanks for your help so far!
--
Jonathan Markevich <jmarkevich@mad.scientist.com>
http://www.geocities.com/jmarkevich
== It's VIRUSES, not VIRII! See http://language.perl.com/misc/virus.html ==
One of the signs of Napoleon's greatness is the fact that he once had a
publisher shot.
-- Siegfried Unseld
Reply to: