Re: woody: xterm "clients" (mc, lynx) do not use the xtrem* from Xresources?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: woody: xterm "clients" (mc, lynx) do not use the xtrem* from Xresources?
- From: "Eric G . Miller" <egm2@jps.net>
- Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2000 22:27:01 -0700
- Message-id: <20000809222701.A7323@calico.local>
- Mail-followup-to: "Eric G . Miller" <egm2@jps.net>, debian-user@lists.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <E13MkHx-0001SJ-00@rakefet>; from shaulk@israsrv.net.il on Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 07:49:50AM +0300
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.21_heb2.09.0008091828410.12782-100000@canada1.technion.ac.il> <tzafrir@technion.ac.il> <E13MkHx-0001SJ-00@rakefet>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2000 at 07:49:50AM +0300, Shaul Karl wrote:
> I was not explaining myself well. Allow me to try once more:
>
> I have a 14" screen. When I am using Debian's menu system and issue
> XShells->Xterm
> I am getting an xterm whose width is roughly the width of my screen. I believe
> that this is due to my use of
> xterm*Font: 10x20
> in my `/.Xresources, which forces the xterm window to be of a certain width.
> Until recently, when I used, for example, Apps->System->Top to see the
> processes on the machine I was getting a window which had the size of the
> above xterm. But starting from Yesterday this is not the case. Now top (or
> other text apps) window is much smaller then my xterms. My guess is that for
> some reason the xterm*Font is not used anymore by these apps. How can I fix it
> so that these xterm "clients" will be opened in a window which has the size of
> my xterms?
> My window manager is fvwm.
Are you positive it's being run with xterm and not some other
x-terminal-emulator (kvt, rxvt, gnome-terminal, etc...)? There are some
subtle differences between xterm*font, Xterm*font, xterm*Font and
Xterm*Font. In an xterm, Ctrl-<Right Click> should allow you to change
the font size on the fly as well (if it doesn't give you a menu -- maybe
it's not an xterm...).
--
MegaHAL quote:
I think a blowpipe is a marijuana cigarrette.
It'll get you deleted!
Reply to: