[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: apt-get gets stuck



Yup, it's a known bug with the latest cvs.  For me, I purged all the
cvs packages and then reinstalled them fresh and it worked fine.

Regards,

Todd


On Fri, 03 Mar 2000, Pollywog wrote:
> I ran 'apt-get upgrade' (potato) and this is what I got:
> 
> The following packages will be upgraded
>   bsdutils cvs cvs-doc cvsup debconf mount netmask python-numeric setserial
>   util-linux whois 
> 11 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 17 not upgraded.
> Need to get 2744kB of archives. After unpacking 616kB will be used.
> Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
> Get:1 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main bsdutils 1:2.10f-3 [29.9kB]
> Get:2 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main mount 2.10f-3 [85.0kB]                  
> Get:3 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main util-linux 2.10f-3 [504kB]              
> Get:4 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main whois 4.4.9 [16.9kB]                    
> Get:5 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main setserial 2.17-10 [33.0kB]              
> Get:6 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main cvs 1.10.7-5 [456kB]                    
> Get:7 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main cvs-doc 1.10.7-5 [875kB]                
> Get:8 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main cvsup 16.1-3 [324kB]                    
> Get:9 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main debconf 0.2.80.13 [128kB]               
> Get:10 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main netmask 2.3.3 [20.8kB]                 
> Get:11 ftp://ftp.debian.org potato/main python-numeric 11-11.5 [272kB]         
> Fetched 2744kB in 14m13s (3216B/s)                                             
> Configuring packages ...      
> 
> It just gets stuck there.  Did this happen to anyone else?
> 
> --
> Andrew
> 
> 
> -- 
> Unsubscribe?  mail -s unsubscribe debian-user-request@lists.debian.org < /dev/null
-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GAT d- s:++ a C++++ UL++++ P+ L++ E---- W++ N++ o-- K- w 
O- M-- V-- PS+ PE Y++ PGP 5++ X++ R* tv+ b+ DI++ D++ 
G e h--- r+++ y+++ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------


Reply to: