[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Apt-get Confusion



On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 09:06:06PM -0500, Henry White wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 20, 2000 at 01:55:28PM +0000, Lane Lester wrote:
>  > 
>  > On Sun, 20 Feb 2000, Ron Rademaker wrote:
>  > > Have you tried 'apt-get -f install', I've had similar problems also and
>  > > apt-get -f install solves most...
>  > 
>  > Is that safe? I seem to recall doing that once some time ago, and it
>  > mangled my system. It would still run, but I recall an awful lot of stuff
>  > got changed.
> 
> Short answer: no, any 'force' is likely to break things. You're actually
> mileage may vary, so you may be very lucky, you may not. You want to take
> that risk? It could be a great learning experience; or hours and hours just
> chasing your tail ;-) It's up to you.

-f in apt-get stands for "--fix-broken", not "--force". fix-broken
should be relatively save. Read the manpage for more information.


-- 
  finger for GPG public key.

Attachment: pgpxIGMKD3nvR.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: