[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: quake-svga signal 11



another thing to check is the cache on the board/chip, disable one at a
time thru the bios and see if it does the same, its gonna run like a 386
but it'll be a decent test to see if the cache sometimes gives bad hits.

worth a shot anyways ...

nate

On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Remco van 't Veer wrote:

rwvtve >On Thu, Feb 03, 2000 at 09:30, aphro wrote:
rwvtve >
rwvtve >> quite possibly a quake-svga problem.  it also could be a mainboard
rwvtve >> problem..is the ram that you scanned that was 'bad' in any particular
rwvtve >> socket? i've had ram sockets go bad on me before when the ram was ok.
rwvtve >
rwvtve >I cycled my "good" SDRAM's through all sockets and give up.  No
rwvtve >bloodshed for me ;-)  Quake-x11 also crashes.
rwvtve >
rwvtve >No other application crashes at peek performance.  I let gimp, emacs,
rwvtve >netscape and oracle8i eat my memory while compiling kernels but all of
rwvtve >them survived, including the running compile.  The oracle installer
rwvtve >died on me a couple of times but I guess oracle installers are
rwvtve >supposed to die on you..
rwvtve >
rwvtve >So, I've got a quake bug to vague to report, until I find an other
rwvtve >application, non video game preferably, that sig11s.
rwvtve >
rwvtve >Remco
rwvtve >
rwvtve >
rwvtve >-- 
rwvtve >aanslag charge van Balen IDEA convict class struggle FSF FNLC
rwvtve >Patijn SEAL Team 6 CD Kosovo explosion colonel kazerne munitions
rwvtve >

----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@aphroland.org ]--
   Vice President Network Operations       http://www.firetrail.com/
  Firetrail Internet Services Limited      http://www.aphroland.org/
       Everett, WA 425-348-7336            http://www.linuxpowered.net/
            Powered By:                    http://comedy.aphroland.org/
    Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP            http://yahoo.aphroland.org/
-----------------------------------------[mailto:aphro@netquest.net ]--
2:06pm up 168 days, 2:16, 1 user, load average: 1.29, 1.14, 1.10


Reply to: