[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Kdevelop working?



>>>>> "DJK" == David J Kanter <djkanter@nwu.edu> writes:
    DJK>  I keep getting this error after apt-getting kdevelop: Errors
    DJK> were encountered while processing: kdevelop E: Sub-process
    DJK> /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

Just installed KDevelop on my potato system. Installed without a problem
and seems to be running fine. KDevelop is the only Qt/KDE related
software on my system.

Here is how the installation proceeded:

@phoenix:[/home/ssahmed] apt-get install kdevelop
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
  kdelibs2g libqt1g 
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  kdelibs2g kdevelop libqt1g 
0 packages upgraded, 3 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 5277kB of archives. After unpacking 16.3MB will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] y
Get:1 http://http.us.debian.org potato/non-free libqt1g 1:1.45-0.4 [731kB]        
Get:2 http://kde.tdyc.com potato/contrib kdevelop 1:1.0-19991103-1 [2877kB]
Get:3 http://kde.tdyc.com potato/kde kdelibs2g 4:1.1.2-20000112-1.0 [1669kB]                                           
Fetched 5277kB in 28m5s (3131B/s)                                                                                      
Selecting previously deselected package libqt1g.
(Reading database ... 24786 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libqt1g (from .../libqt1g_1%3a1.45-0.4_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package kdelibs2g.
Unpacking kdelibs2g (from .../kdelibs2g_4%3a1.1.2-20000112-1.0_i386.deb) ...
Selecting previously deselected package kdevelop.
Unpacking kdevelop (from .../kdevelop_1%3a1.0-19991103-1_i386.deb) ...
Setting up libqt1g (1.45-0.4) ...

Setting up kdelibs2g (1.1.2-20000112-1.0) ...
Verifying HTML directory is configured properly:  Looks ok

Setting up kdevelop (1.0-19991103-1) ...


-- 
Salman Ahmed
ssahmed AT pathcom DOT com


Reply to: