[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: vrweb won't compile under potato



thanks, i'd like try and fix it as i do like the program :) however i also
don't have much time so don't expect too much yet! 

please send me the patches and any hints would be appreciated...

thanks :)
Paul

On Tue, 14 Sep 1999, Fabien Ninoles wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 14, 1999 at 01:15:59AM +0800, Paul Harris wrote:
> > hi,
> > 
> > i'm trying to find _any_ vrml viewer for my potato system (recently
> > upgraded from slink). vrweb was working fine, but now just segfaults. i
> > reinstalled it and have the same problem. i downloaded the source packages
> > from my debian mirror and used the debian scripts to try and compile it,
> > but the compile failed!
> > 
> > has anyone got a solution? i wouldn't mind working on fixing the problems
> > (i'm not a bad programmer), but don't want to duplicate efforts... 
> > 
> > thanks,
> > Paul
> > 
> > 
> 
> I'm the current maintainer of vrweb. I offer it to adoption because I
> can't get it compiled and don't have time to work much on it. vrweb it's
> a real mess and I can't make it compiles too. I know that Georges
> <georgesk@boltz.univ-littoral.fr> send me some patches that I can send back
> to you if desire. It replaces the dynamic-array implementation with the
> standard vector.h template.
> 
> vrweb is an entangled mix of many old libraries (Mesa, Harmony, etc.)
> glued together with automake. I'll be happy if you to take it or at
> least fix it.
> 
> Have a good day,
> 
> 
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Fabien Ninoles        Chevalier servant de la Dame Catherine des Rosiers
> aka Corbeau aka le Veneur Gris               Debian GNU/Linux maintainer
> E-mail:                                                    fab@tzone.org
> WebPage:                                    http://www.tzone.org/~fabien
> RSA PGP KEY [E3723845]: 1C C1 4F A6 EE E5 4D 99  4F 80 2D 2D 1F 85 C1 70
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 


Reply to: