Re: Debian and Redhat - are most linux users missing the point?
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 28, 1999 at 12:44:20PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Try Emacs or XEmacs. Don't be mislead by the fact that they call Emacs
> > an editor - it's far, far more than a mere editor. It has support for
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> This is an excellent summary of why you should not use emacs :-)
Think of EMACS as more of an IDE than an editor. If you need an IDE that
you will live in all day long, it is fine. If you are just making a few
edits, it is a waste.
Reply to: