Re: Was the release of Debian 2.0 put on Linux Announce?
>>"George" == George Bonser <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
George> On Sun, 2 Aug 1998, Joey Hess wrote:
>> I have to wonder why such people bother with linux (2.0) when there are such
>> obviously numerically superior os's out there like, say, windows (95).
George> I suppose the Linux Standard Base will provide common
George> versioning over distributions and take care of this
George> problem. I fear that it will end up being Red Hat driven,
Nope, the LSB is not going to determine version numbering. And
I vote we go andbeat all them distributions out there. Lets call the
next version 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000002.1.
There. That should convince the world. No wonder we are not
world beaters. We just missed out on the version number. Look out,
microsoft, here we come.
Who stole the cork from my breakfast? -- W. C. Fields
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.datasync.com/%7Esrivasta/>
Key C7261095 fingerprint = CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe firstname.lastname@example.org < /dev/null