Richard Davies writes:
> This is a request for some feedback from current and potential users of GPC.
> I have GPC 2.0 compiled for hamm, built using GCC 126.96.36.199. The next
> version of GPC (currently 971001) is in beta, but is already more stable
> than GPC 2.0. There seems to be a few possibilities available. I could
> package GPC 2.0, GPC 971001 beta, both versions, or wait until GPC 971001
> beta is released as GPC 2.1. Let me know your preferences, if any, within
> the next few of days and I will then decide which course of action to take.
I'd say package 2.1 beta, into unstable and 2.0 as stable. Then
update the beta package when GPC get's released.
I have a few pascal programs, that would be nice to compile on Linux
and I'd want to use 2.1 as it is more complete than 2.0.
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
Trouble? e-mail to email@example.com .
- Re: GPC
- From: Brian White <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- From: Richard Davies <email@example.com>