[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: cursor problems in firefox



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

P G escribió:
> hi did you have "jumping-cursor" problem ???
>
> 2006/12/8, Santiago R. Lunar M. <santiago.lunar@gmail.com>: sigi
> escribió:
>> Hi,
>
>> since I'm using the nv-video module here, my cursor shows strange
>>  behaviour in any form fields in firefox: If I write something
>> into formulas on websites, or even into the url-line, my cursor
>> produces a new cursor after every single character, when I'm
>> using my arrow-keys to e.g. correct something wrong I typed in.
>> It's very annoying,
> and only
>> happens in my browsers like firefox and galeon...
>
>> Has anyone a hint, how I can stop this? I'm using
>> xserver-xorg7.1, linux-image-2.6.18 with the built-in nv-driver
>> (since my machine had a lot of crashes with built-by-myself
>> nvidia-driver, I'm afraid to give it a try again - but btw with
>> nvidia-driver this cursor-problem was not there.)
>
>> Thanks, sigi.
>
>
>
> I had the same problem and it went away when i installed the nvidia
>  (propietary) drivers. The thing was really annoying.
>
> -- santiago.lunar@jabberes.org a.K.a [chantanito] Linux user
> #397015 Linux machine #330946 powered by Debian Clave de huella =
> 6B8D 4024 CCCD 8654 0951  A1AD EEA8 D61E 1E80 FE8B
>>>
>>>
> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-amd64-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>>>
>>>
>
Any, just the one metioned above.

P.D: PLEASE REPLIES TO THE LIST!!!


- --
santiago.lunar@jabberes.org
a.K.a [chantanito]
Linux user #397015
Linux machine #330946 powered by Debian
Clave de huella = 6B8D 4024 CCCD 8654 0951  A1AD EEA8 D61E 1E80 FE8B
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFfC3s7qjWHh6A/osRAjMwAKCNkyGLOgrgDCXxykWiTpcPnMYCIQCgxaKN
PBueygzGg0HRRg0msp8+WyQ=
=5RVg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: