[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Duda sobre kernel [comentario de expertos en el tema].



El mar, 06-09-2005 a las 13:29 -0300, Martin C. escribió:
> Hi all... I have a doubt about the kernel package in Debian Sarge.
> I always download the kernel-source-* package and then compile it in my 
> system. But I have noted the kernel package is always with the same size and 
> version. Is it manteined? 3 bugs ago I was watching and never change the size 
> or version of kernel package. Why is that? I do the apt-get update, upgrade 
> thing and never download a newer version. How can I download a patched 
> version of the debian kernel package?
> Sorry by my horrible english, and thanks.
> 
> Respuesta de Horms <horms@debian.org>:
> 
> Sarge is now released, and as such updates only take two form -
> security updates which are done as the need arises, and release
> updates, which occur once or twice a year. The Kernel Team is
> working on making sure the kernel does get updated in Sarge.
> 
> However, in answer to your question, yes it is out of date,
> and to be honest that is the nature of a stable release. If
> you want something fresher try unstable or stable, and
> the packages provided by linux-2.6, currently linux-source-2.6.12,
> but soon to be linux-source-2.6.13.
> 
Martin:
me parece que la respuesta a tu pregunta fue parcialmente correcta ya
que no entendio lo que quisiste decirle
Preguntale: Por que todavia no se hicieron updates de seguridad en el
paquete del kernel de Sarge

El tipo entendio la pregunta como algo general, pensando que vos no
sabias que en stable no se cambia de VERSION 

> El hilo completo, por si te interesa leerlo:
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/2005/09/msg00067.html
> 
> Saludos.
> 
> -- 
> -- Martin.
> 
> 
-- 
Angel Claudio Alvarez
Usuario Linux Registrado 143466
GPG Public Key en http://pgp.mit.edu
key fingerprint = 3AED D95B 7E2D E954 61C8  F505 1884 473C FC8C 8AC4

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: