[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: DELIVERY FAILURE: User jzunzu



Pues a mi tambien, y supongo que a todos, al parecer ese usuario ya no existe en ese servidor de correo, el administrador de la lista debería eliminarlo..

chao..

>Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:55:29 +0200
> Faro <faro@dgp.mir.es> debian-user-spanish@lists.debian.org DELIVERY FAILURE: User jzunzu
>     
>     Cada vez que mando un mensaje a la lista, me llega un mensaje de
>     error que os pego por si podeis decirme algo.
>
>     From: Postmaster@portsmouth.uk.ibm.com
>     Subject: DELIVERY FAILURE: User jzunzu (jzunzu@ibmes) not listed in
>     public Name
>      & Address Book
>     To: Faro <faro@dgp.mir.es>
>     Reply-to: Faro <faro@dgp.mir.es>
>
>     Your message
>
>       Subject: Re: ac97 integrada en placa
>
>    was not delivered to:
>
>         jzunzu%ibmes@uk.ibm.com
>
>     because:
>
>      User jzunzu (jzunzu@ibmes) not listed in public Name & Address Book
>       
>     --==IFJRGLKFGIR53364UHRUHIHD
>     Content-Type: message/delivery-status
>
>     Reporting-MTA: dns;d18hubm1.es.ibm.com
>
>     Final-Recipient: rfc822;jzunzu%ibmes@es.ibm.com
>     Action: failed
>     Status: 5.1.1
>     Diagnostic-Code: X-Notes; User jzunzu (jzunzu@ibmes) not listed in
>     public Name & Address Book
>
>     --==IFJRGLKFGIR53364UHRUHIHD
>     Content-Type: message/rfc822
>     
>     ¿A alguien más le ha pasado? ¿Soluciones?
>     
>-- 
>Best things in life are free!
>faro at escomposlinux . org
>Debian GNU/Linux 
>Usuario Linux #162541
>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
>Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
>iD8DBQE7St8h6gmaVObFsg0RAtJtAKCuFaHENRkY2jC+SZzxlGOWm1MsTwCfWzPG
>BxJjP4mn2kSoDK6fxu792uI=
>=ccHX
>-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Ricardo Rodríguez
Cartago - Colombia

------------------------------------------------------------
Shop Smart Compare Prices on Name-Brand Products from Name-Brand Stores!!
http://www.smartshop.com/cgi-bin/main.cgi?ssa=4099



Reply to: