[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [testing] problème avec Firewire sur CM ASUS P8P67 LE



On Sun, 5 Feb 2012 00:43:22 +0100
Gaëtan PERRIER <gaetan.perrier@neuf.fr> wrote:

> J'ai un problème avec une carte mère ASUS P8P67 LE (BIOS à jour) et le
> firewire.

Je dirais plutôt avec le DMA ATA.

> doesn't support DPO or FUA [   98.379273]  sdh: sdh1
> [   98.381854] sd 12:0:0:0: [sdh] Attached SCSI disk
> [   98.703626] kjournald starting.  Commit interval 5 seconds
> [   98.703810] EXT3-fs (sdh1): warning: checktime reached, running e2fsck is
> recommended [   98.704240] EXT3-fs (sdh1): using internal journal
> [   98.704244] EXT3-fs (sdh1): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
> [  247.642981] irq 19: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [  247.642988] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: P           O 3.1.0-1-686-pae #1
> [  247.642990] Call Trace:
> [  247.642999]  [<c1076d25>] ? __report_bad_irq+0x1c/0x8d
> [  247.643003]  [<c1076f2f>] ? note_interrupt+0x122/0x18f
> [  247.643007]  [<c1075c37>] ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x142/0x158
> [  247.643011]  [<c1077444>] ? handle_level_irq+0x62/0x62
> [  247.643015]  [<c1075c6e>] ? handle_irq_event+0x21/0x37
> [  247.643018]  [<c1077444>] ? handle_level_irq+0x62/0x62
> [  247.643022]  [<c10774a4>] ? handle_fasteoi_irq+0x60/0x78
> [  247.643024]  <IRQ>  [<c100ca37>] ? do_IRQ+0x2e/0x76
> [  247.643033]  [<c12b3370>] ? common_interrupt+0x30/0x38
> [  247.643037]  [<c103007b>] ? sched_debug_show+0x165/0xb17
> [  247.643041]  [<c11855ff>] ? intel_idle+0xb9/0xde
> [  247.643047]  [<c11f59ce>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xcd/0x140
> [  247.643051]  [<c100aef1>] ? cpu_idle+0x86/0xaa
> [  247.643054]  [<c1440708>] ? start_kernel+0x32a/0x32f
> [  247.643056] handlers:
> [  247.643081] [<f82c8ebf>] ata_bmdma_interrupt
> [  247.643087] [<f830764d>] irq_handler
> [  247.643090] Disabling IRQ #19

Reteste en désactivant l'APIC pour retomber en PIC.

-- 
  Talking about a piece of movie dialogue: Let's have some new
  cliches. -Samuel Goldwyn


Reply to: