[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Plus d'un an pour une mise à jour de sécurité!



Bonjour,

Lors de l'upgrade de ce soir pour testing, il y a notamment:

Inst imlib-base [1.9.14-16.2] (1.9.14-24 Debian:testing)

Mais que peut-on lire dans le ChangeLog? Ceci:

imlib (1.9.14-24) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
 -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@debian.org>  Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:52:36 -0700

imlib (1.9.14-23) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
 -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@debian.org>  Tue, 11 Oct 2005 23:56:51 -0700

imlib (1.9.14-22) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
 -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@debian.org>  Mon, 10 Oct 2005 10:37:42 -0700

imlib (1.9.14-21) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
 -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@debian.org>  Wed,  5 Oct 2005 02:06:20 -0700

imlib (1.9.14-20) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
 -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@debian.org>  Sun,  2 Oct 2005 19:34:13 -0700

imlib (1.9.14-19) unstable; urgency=low
[...]
 -- Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tb@debian.org>  Tue, 27 Sep 2005 21:49:51 -0700

imlib (1.9.14-17.1) unstable; urgency=high

  * Non-maintainer upload.
  * High-urgency upload for sarge-targetted RC bugfix
  * CAN-2004-1026: fix various overflows in image decoding routines.
    Closes: #284925.

 -- Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>  Thu, 16 Dec 2004 05:57:41 -0800

imlib (1.9.14-17) unstable; urgency=high

  * Applied patch by Marcus Meissner <meissner@suse.de> to fix arbitrary
    code execution through a heap overflow [gdk_imlib/io-bmp.c,
    CAN-2004-0817, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151034]
  
  * imlib.m4: Quote macros AM_PATH_IMLIB and AM_PATH_GDK_IMLIB.  
    Closes: #267804.

 -- Steve M. Robbins <smr@debian.org>  Tue, 31 Aug 2004 19:50:02 -0400

Bref, la mise à jour de sécurité du 31 août 2004 (pourtant en
urgency=high) n'arrive dans testing que maintenant!

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@vinc17.org> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.org/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.org/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / SPACES project at LORIA



Reply to: