Re: TL2012 status 2012-02-28
Norbert Preining <email@example.com> wrote:
>> > Why are you strongly *against* transition away form it?
>> One the one hand, I fear that things might break (where "things" are
>> most problably other TeX-related packages). On the other hand
> What for example? Which other package is tinkering with texmf.cnf?
> ANd anyway, *most* packages have to be rebuild anyway for the new
> updmap.cfg handling in dh_installtex.
Once upon a time, jadetex did to our surprise. But in fact - nowadays
there are hardly any TeX-related packages that aren't in our repository
or we at least know well what they are doing.
> Honestly, sometimes one has to break with that. ANd we are not the only
> ones. I have often seen local config files changed and everything
> dropped. Giving a warning is enough for my taste.
I understood that it's as easy as moving lines from files
/etc/texmf/texmf.d.disabled to /etc/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf? Then I
Sprecher B90/Grüne OV Miltenberg und Umgebung
VCD Miltenberg, ADFC Aschaffenburg-Miltenberg
Debian Developer (TeXLive)