Re: fiaif: FTBFS: I can't find file `ecrm1095'.
On Mit, 02 Mai 2007, Frank Küster wrote:
> > ! I can't find file `ecrm1095'.
>
> That's an interesting one: It used only texlive-latex-base as
> Build-Dep. It's already fixed by adding tl-latex-recommended, I hope it
> works this time.
Should.
> (Hint: This wouldn't have happened if all packages uploaded to the
> archive were built in clean chroots...)
What I am normally doing ...
> I wonder whether we should think of gathering information about a
> potential "texlive-builddep" package. While there are reasons that
> collection-latexbase does not contain the EC fonts, most packages that
> build-depend on TeX will need them, and there might be similar cases.
Or `texlive'?
Depends: texlive-fonts-recommended, texlive-latex-recommended, texlive-latex-base
which is reasonable.
> Or we just suggest maintainers to start with texlive-latex-recommended
> instead of -base? Or we make clean-chroot-builds mandatory?
No chance.
Best wishes
Norbert
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dr. Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Università di Siena
Debian Developer <preining@debian.org> Debian TeX Group
gpg DSA: 0x09C5B094 fp: 14DF 2E6C 0307 BE6D AD76 A9C0 D2BF 4AA3 09C5 B094
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now it is such a bizarrely improbable coincidence that
anything so mindboggingly useful could have evolved purely
by chance that some thinkers have chosen to see it as the
final and clinching proof of the non-existence of God.
The argument goes something like this: `I refuse to prove
that I exist,' says God, `for proof denies faith, and
without faith I am nothing.'
The Babel fish is a dead giveaway, isn't
it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves you
exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't.
QED.'
--- Douglas Adams, The Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy
Reply to: