Bug#418995: SVN texlive (new) commit: r2684 - in texlive-new/trunk: all/debian texlive-base/debian texlive-bin/debian texlive-lang/debian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Frank Küster wrote:
> > I don't think this is the correct solution. We already have
> > conflicts;texlive-common;tetex-bin (<< 2007), tetex-base (<< 2007), tetex-extra (<< 2007), tetex-doc (<< 2007)
> > Furthermore, in all of Rene's reports there is something like
> > Versions of packages texlive-font-utils depends on:
> > ii libc6 2.5-1 GNU C Library: Shared libraries
FWIW, this was upgraded in this same dist-upgrade run. I see that
the texlive binaries for ppc already picked up a dep on libc6 >= 2.5, maybe
that has something to do with it?
> > On a normal install, apt-get or aptitude will first install tl-common
> > before trying any of the packages Rene reported about, and this will
> it didn't.
> it didn't. On the seconf try continuing the upgrade it did, yes,but not
> at the first run.
> > I've tried this long ago...
Not to mention the behaviour is non-deterministic. I've seen that often
that it did a specific order on system A and another one on B.
.''`. Ren? Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' email@example.com | GnuPG-Key ID: 248AEB73
`- Fingerprint: 41FA F208 28D4 7CA5 19BB 7AD9 F859 90B0 248A EB73
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----