Re: intent to do a poppler transition
just to repeat: If you want to do the poppler transition, it is *your*
task to check:
* Steve Langasek (email@example.com) [061005 21:22]:
> > - In any case, shouldn't we carefully check all affected packages,
> > whether they FTBFS and whether they still work? This would IMO
> > require a phase where all of them are in experimental, except poppler
> > itself in case it gets a new dev package name.
> Yes, given the current release schedule, this new libpoppler transition will
> only be considered for etch if someone does rebuild and test all the
> reverse-dependencies, providing any necessary patches and documenting these
> to the release team.
Given the current date, I don't expect the poppler transition to happen,
unless that happens very fast. And even in that case, please speak with
us before uploading the package to unstable.