Re: Proposal for collection reorganization
Norbert Preining <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> ad 2) collection-chemistry/-science
> Reading through the list of packages in collection-latexextra I have a
> hard time to make a selection what to move to -science and what not.
> Where do we draw (IF WE DO!) the line? Computer science move yes or no,
> some special packages yes or no, radical approach?
> I would opt for a radical approach to move *everything* which is somehow
> related to natural sciences, linguistic, philosophy etc into this
> package. This way we would get two decent sized collections where
> latexextra contains stuff which is generally usefull, while science
> cotains specific stuff.
Same problem, now the other way round: English speaking people will not
expect linguistic stuff in "science". Is there a word for
"Wissenschaft" or french "science" in english?
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)