Re: tetex-src, doc licenses
- To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: tetex-src, doc licenses
- From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2006 17:19:57 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 86lkvub0ia.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
- In-reply-to: <20060225210049.GB10998@thinkpad> (Ralf Stubner's message of "Sat, 25 Feb 2006 22:00:49 +0100")
- References: <86d5hhyqef.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20060223171213.GH13304@excelhustler.com> <5qbqwx9b7b.fsf@ma8.sees.bangor.ac.uk> <20060223192944.GA28843@thinkpad> <86psld6pwc.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <877j7lm1if.fsf@florent.maison> <873bi9m10z.fsf@florent.maison> <86wtfk4vl8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20060224162925.GA4777@thinkpad> <86bqww3b6b.fsf_-_@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <20060225210049.GB10998@thinkpad>
Ralf Stubner <ralf.stubner@web.de> wrote:
> Looking at remove-nonfreedocs in tetex-base I am not
> sure how it is used. It looks as if one would export the current
> tetex-base tree, call remove-nonfreedocs and then use dpkg-buildpackage,
> right? That way, everything is still in SVN but the nonfree stuff does
> not appear in the orig.tar.gz. Copying remove-nonfreedocs from
> tetex-base to tetex-src and adjusting the lists of files at the top
> should be enough, right?
No, I designed and used it a little differently. I keep checked out
copies with this layout:
src/Packages/tetex-base/tetex-base-3.0/
src/Packages/tetex-doc-nonfree/tetex-doc-nonfree-<version>/
and call the script from within the tetex-base-3.0 directory. If the
option --copy is given, it will automatically add the files it removes
to the tetex-doc-nofree tree. Whether we remove the files from the
tetex-base svn repository doesn't matter much, I guess.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer (teTeX)
Reply to: