Re: Processed: I guess this will not work, however

To: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>(tetex-base #338638)
Subject: Re: Processed: I guess this will not work, however
From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:04:23 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 86wtgzvtlk.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] handler.s.C.113750174218128.transcript@bugs.debian.org> (Debian Bug Tracking System's message of "Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:48:14 -0800")
References: <8664ojyqhb.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <[🔎] handler.s.C.113750174218128.transcript@bugs.debian.org>

owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System) wrote:

> Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:
>
>> reopen 338638
> Bug#338638: tetex-base: dies when /usr/local/ read-only
> Bug reopened, originator not changed.

Fine, it seems one can reopen archived bugs if the BTS thinks they still
apply to some version...

-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to:

References:
- Processed: I guess this will not work, however
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Please hint tetex into testing
Next by Date: Bug#348513: [SPAM?]: Bug#348513: tetex-doc: tetexdoctk fails with "Couldn't open system-wide default config file texdocrc"
Previous by thread: Processed: I guess this will not work, however
Next by thread: Processed: sid uses libpoppler
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread