Bug#347355: marked as done (unable to install tetex-extra, preinst failure)
Your message dated Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:47:26 -0800
with message-id <E1EyqFC-0004xM-91@spohr.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#347355: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jan 2006 09:33:35 +0000
>From blade@debian.org Tue Jan 10 01:33:35 2006
Return-path: <blade@debian.org>
Received: from mailgate1.uni-kl.de ([131.246.120.5])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EwFsl-0007IM-2H
for submit@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:33:35 -0800
Received: from zombie (rotes76.wohnheim.uni-kl.de [131.246.178.179])
by mailgate1.uni-kl.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0A9XVTW014889
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:33:32 +0100
Received: from inet by zombie with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <blade@debian.org>)
id 1EwFsh-0002KF-TG; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:33:31 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: unable to install tetex-extra, preinst failure
Message-ID: <[🔎] 20060110093331.8404.83087.reportbug@zombie.inka.de>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:33:31 +0100
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: tetex-extra
Version: 1.0.2+20021025-7
Severity: grave
Hello,
I cannot install tetex-extra because its preinst shows weird md5sum
problems (see below). I have been told that may be caused by obsolete coreutils,
however this is a up-to-date Sid system (installed with Slink or so and
dist-upgraded from then). Tetex-extra may have been installed and then
deinstalled in the past, I don't remember.
$ apt-get -f install
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Correcting dependencies... Done
The following extra packages will be installed:
tetex-extra
The following NEW packages will be installed:
tetex-extra
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 97 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 0B/10.8MB of archives.
After unpacking 43.2MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
debconf: delaying package configuration, since apt-utils is not installed
(Reading database ... 205050 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking tetex-extra (from .../tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb) ...
/etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams: md5sum not known. Exiting
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb (--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/tetex-extra_3.0-11_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
ls -la /etc/texmf/dvips/config.*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 167 Sep 1 2002 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 Jun 30 1998 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams.dpkg-old
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 258 Sep 1 2002 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 Jun 30 1998 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz.dpkg-old
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 185 Sep 1 2002 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 51 Jun 30 1998 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm.dpkg-old
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 262 Sep 1 2002 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 52 Jun 30 1998 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz.dpkg-old
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 166 May 23 1998 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.mirrorprint
md5sum /etc/texmf/dvips/config.*
df69e80e8157afde30550f21317bbd6d /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams
32c36b063268c5e45819fe8114ce3cf0 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.ams.dpkg-old
0ef9213edceaaba3185a79e5946c8411 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz
b9c14f2d2e3923372e9067e2e1ee47b5 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.amz.dpkg-old
363c5ef43576af28b14330ae78ed5de8 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm
68d23ead2901dddbc1779c905806b783 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cm.dpkg-old
949213a1865415e6f5199188ee57419e /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz
830f16e1e39c67b1c665a8b09824a7b4 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.cmz.dpkg-old
d8fe8cd35cf178202ee13f64c66dd2d9 /etc/texmf/dvips/config.mirrorprint
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages tetex-extra depends on:
ii dpkg 1.13.11.0.1 package maintenance system for Deb
ii gsfonts 8.14+v8.11+urw-0.2 Fonts for the Ghostscript interpre
ii perl-tk 1:800.025-2 Perl module providing the Tk graph
ii tetex-base 3.0-11 Basic library files of teTeX
pn tetex-bin <none> (no description available)
tetex-extra recommends no packages.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 347355-close) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2006 12:50:33 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Tue Jan 17 04:50:33 2006
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EyqFC-0004xM-91; Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:47:26 -0800
From: =?utf-8?q?Frank_K=C3=BCster?= <frank@debian.org>
To: 347355-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.65 $
Subject: Bug#347355: fixed in tetex-base 3.0-12
Message-Id: <E1EyqFC-0004xM-91@spohr.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:47:26 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: tetex-base
Source-Version: 3.0-12
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
tetex-base, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
tetex-base_3.0-12.diff.gz
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-12.diff.gz
tetex-base_3.0-12.dsc
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-12.dsc
tetex-base_3.0-12_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-base_3.0-12_all.deb
tetex-doc_3.0-12_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-doc_3.0-12_all.deb
tetex-extra_3.0-12_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tetex-base/tetex-extra_3.0-12_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 347355@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> (supplier of updated tetex-base package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:14:15 +0100
Source: tetex-base
Binary: tetex-extra tetex-doc tetex-base
Architecture: source all
Version: 3.0-12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: teTeX maintainers <debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Description:
tetex-base - Basic library files of teTeX
tetex-doc - The documentation component of the Debian teTeX packages
tetex-extra - Additional library files of teTeX
Closes: 321257 321804 334723 343572 344212 347355
Changes:
tetex-base (3.0-12) unstable; urgency=low
.
* add magic comment to language.d/00tetex.cnf [preining]
* tetex-extra now depends on tetex-base (>= 3.0-11), in order to prevent
partial upgrades with tetex-extra's files already in TEXMFDIST without
tetex-base and tex-common being updated appropriately (closes:
#343572) [frank]
* Add two missing md5sums to the list in common.functions (closes:
#344212) [frank]
* Bump standards-version to 3.6.2 (no changes needed except the
still outstanding fixes for #139353) [frank]
* When handling obsolete conffiles, also cater for files from woody,
necessary if tetex-extra has been in state rc throughout sarge
(closes: #347355) [frank]
* Again add the watchfile which was lost in sid; update it's syntax a
little. [frank]
* Do not keep a copy of the static language.dat if it is the version
shipped with woody or sarge (closes: #321804) [frank]
* Don't claim to remove unchanged conffiles if no conffiles are on the
system at all [frank]
* Unregister obsolete debconf questions (closes: #334723) [frank]
* Document in NEWS.Debian that we cannot migrate user's changes from old
00updmap.cfg to 10tetex-base.cfg and 10tetex-extra.cfg (closes:
#321257) [frank]
* Do not let the preinst fail just because the previously installed
version is pre-sarge, as we did deliberately during experimental
development.
* Fix reportbug script handling [preining]
Files:
985a346e1dfdd98974263f8548e3d6d6 794 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-12.dsc
e3528e0ad2e1ea7643f8a11f59342858 343752 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-12.diff.gz
a024a4aa596534627da720bf03da533b 22396298 tex optional tetex-base_3.0-12_all.deb
bcc5ea507fc7edadeb2f96ba1afa2429 10823270 tex optional tetex-extra_3.0-12_all.deb
ef369e0c24a10e2b933ba26380da6054 50142848 doc optional tetex-doc_3.0-12_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDzOWE+xs9YyJS+hoRAkd6AJ9kTjKrEWKokQkOfKyEOLQC5yAhAwCeM23V
uB41Emhh0nxDjTnvkYM7DKw=
=KKv/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: