Bug#335477: [SPAM?]: Bug#335477: tetex-bin: /etc/alternatives/oxdvi.bin is still there

To: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Cc: 335477@bugs.debian.org, Jochen Sprickerhof <jochen@sprickerhof.de>
Subject: Bug#335477: [SPAM?]: Bug#335477: tetex-bin: /etc/alternatives/oxdvi.bin is still there
From: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:40:30 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 864q4dh3c1.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
Reply-to: Frank Küster <frank@debian.org>, 335477@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20060103172804.GA2564@preusse> (Hilmar Preusse's message of "Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:28:04 +0100")
References: <[🔎] 20060103160339.GA26774@zinzendorfschule.de> <[🔎] 20060103172804.GA2564@preusse>

Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> wrote:

> reopen 335477
> tags 335477 + patch
> stop
>
> On 03.01.06 Jochen Sprickerhof (jochen@sprickerhof.de) wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>> in tetex.postinst line 794 the alternative for oxdvi.bin is
>> removed, butt in line 814 it's again created.
>> 
> Thanks for spotting. Patch attached.

It seems it was lost...

Thank you,
Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Bug#335477: [SPAM?]: Bug#335477: tetex-bin: /etc/alternatives/oxdvi.bin is still there
  - From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>

References:
- Bug#335477: tetex-bin: /etc/alternatives/oxdvi.bin is still there
  - From: Jochen Sprickerhof <jochen@sprickerhof.de>
- Bug#335477: tetex-bin: /etc/alternatives/oxdvi.bin is still there
  - From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>

Prev by Date: Bug#346326: tetex-bin: postinst fails -- dvips35.map not found
Next by Date: Bug#345604: ConTeXt documentation is non-free
Previous by thread: Bug#335477: tetex-bin: /etc/alternatives/oxdvi.bin is still there
Next by thread: Bug#335477: [SPAM?]: Bug#335477: tetex-bin: /etc/alternatives/oxdvi.bin is still there
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread