Bug#302286: tetex-bin: postinst fails with Error: `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' failed

To: Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de>
Cc: 302286@bugs.debian.org, Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
Subject: Bug#302286: tetex-bin: postinst fails with Error: `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' failed
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster)
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 09:14:19 +0200
Message-id: <8764z7m0j8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch>
Reply-to: frank@kuesterei.ch (Frank Küster), 302286@bugs.debian.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503311834380.3338@mercury.sdinet.de> (Sven-Haegar Koch's message of "Thu, 31 Mar 2005 18:52:16 +0200 (CEST)")
References: <E1DGokZ-0006Dh-00@aurora> <87is38mfmf.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503310957510.24425@mercury.sdinet.de> <20050331083303.GB2204@preusse> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503311140010.13719@mercury.sdinet.de> <87ll840wqn.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <87fyyb4yh8.fsf@alhambra.kuesterei.ch> <Pine.LNX.4.62.0503311834380.3338@mercury.sdinet.de>

Sven-Haegar Koch <haegar@sdinet.de> wrote:

> I don't think I can expect that the automatic updates are able to
> update from every stone old config files found from an intermediate
> unstable release nearly three years ago - so perhaps this bug can just
> be closed.

I agree.  However, the file itself was still present in woody, so your
setup would have worked there.  Therefore, if I find that providing an
upgrade path isn't hard, I'll do that, and would like to keep the bug
open. 

Regards, Frank
-- 
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer

Reply to:

Next by Date: Bug#302286: tetex-bin: postinst fails with Error: `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' failed
Next by thread: Bug#302286: tetex-bin: postinst fails with Error: `tex -ini -jobname=latex -progname=latex latex.ini' failed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread