Bug#38290: marked as done (tetex-base: postscript fonts, psfonts.map and tetex updates)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:42 +0100
with message-id <20041115082942.GE1156@preusse>
and subject line Bug#38290: tetex-base: postscript fonts, psfonts.map and tetex updates
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 May 1999 09:27:40 +0000
Received: (qmail 3896 invoked from network); 25 May 1999 09:27:39 -0000
Received: from pkfp20.phy.tu-dresden.de (mail@141.30.80.84)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 25 May 1999 09:27:39 -0000
Received: from ujr by pkfp20.phy.tu-dresden.de with local (Exim 2.11 #1 (Debian))
id 10mDUf-0000Qr-00; Tue, 25 May 1999 11:27:29 +0200
From: Ulf Jaenicke-Roessler <ujr@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de>
Subject: tetex-base: postscript fonts, psfonts.map and tetex updates
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.8
Message-Id: <E10mDUf-0000Qr-00@pkfp20.phy.tu-dresden.de>
Date: Tue, 25 May 1999 11:27:29 +0200
Package: tetex-base
Version: 0.9.990510-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I'm looking for a way to add postscript font information into psfonts.map
without the need to reinsert it after every tetex upgrade which changes
the psfonts.map file.
Is there already an recommended way of doing this? If not, I would suggest
to use a separate directory for user installable map files and "source"
them somehow (similar to what modutils do with update-modules). I'm sorry
that I can't be more detailed here because of lack of knowledge about
internal (la)tex organization.
/etc/texmf/updmap doesn't seem appropriate because it requires changes
to this file as well.
Thanks,
Ulf
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 38290-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2004 08:30:14 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Mon Nov 15 00:30:14 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CTcFa-0004RA-00; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 00:30:14 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.102 #165)
id 1CTcF5-0005M0-00
for 38290-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:43 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:43 +0100
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:42 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 38290-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#38290: tetex-base: postscript fonts, psfonts.map and tetex updates
Message-ID: <20041115082942.GE1156@preusse>
References: <14155.47177.850746.918736@arthur.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE> <9905260940.AA22617@physik.phy.tu-dresden.de> <20031030150358.GA23741@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de> <878ygjuosc.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <878ygjuosc.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 38290-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On 26.04.04 Frank Küster (frank@kuesterei.ch) wrote:
Hi Ulf,
> Note that the bug report is five years old. But today in fact it is
> different. Hilmar told me that you had a discussion with him
> off-list about this bug.
>
> If you think now that today's method of registering fonts is what
> you want, and we can close this bug, then please do this, by
> sending mail to 38290-done@bugs.debian.org. Otherwise I would be
> glad if you could write a short mail to the bug, stating what you
> consider that is needed, so that we have a chance to implement it
> when we find time (probably not for sarge, and that's exactly why
> I'd like to have it in the archive).
>
Yes, we had a personal discussion about that. Unfortunately you
didn't state how the architecture to register PS-fonts should look
like. I close that bug now. If you're willing to contribute (I.e. to
tell us at least, how the tools should look like/work), feel free to
reopen.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: