Bug#130755: marked as done (tetex-{bin,base,extra} dependancy problem)
Your message dated Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:23 +0100
with message-id <20041115082923.GD1156@preusse>
and subject line Bug#130755: tetex-{bin,base,extra} dependancy problem
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2002 09:01:59 +0000
>From dgigan@etu.info.unicaen.fr Fri Jan 25 03:01:59 2002
Return-path: <dgigan@etu.info.unicaen.fr>
Received: from rantanplan.info.unicaen.fr [193.55.128.2]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16U2FD-0006a8-00; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 03:01:59 -0600
Received: (qmail 8197 invoked from network); 25 Jan 2002 09:01:50 -0000
Received: (qmfilt: 1.0); 25 Jan 2002 09:01:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO hades.info.unicaen.fr) (10.130.9.3)
by smtp.etu.info.unicaen.fr with SMTP; 25 Jan 2002 09:01:50 -0000
Received: from dgigan by hades.info.unicaen.fr with local (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
id 16U2EB-0001Pk-00
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:00:55 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15441.7877.189345.57751@hades.info.unicaen.fr>
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 10:00:53 +0100
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-{bin,base,extra} dependancy problem
X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under Emacs 21.1.1
From: Davy Gigan <dgigan@etu.info.unicaen.fr>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Package: tetex-bin
Version: 1.0.7+20001218-4
Severity: normal
I've experienced some problems while trying to upgrade my tetex-{bin,base,extra}
packages :
i've successfully updated these versions :
ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20001218-4
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20000804-8
ii tetex-extra 1.0.2+20000804-8
to these :
ii tetex-bin 1.0.7+20011202-2
ii tetex-base 1.0.2+20011202-1
ii tetex-extra 1.0.2+20011202-1
however when i tried to use dvips or xdvi to visualise files, then went
porblems with gs, the version was :
ii gs 5.50-8
I have upgraded gs to version :
ii gs 6.51-7
Some problems were solved, but not all, with the fonts. then i've upgraded
gsfonts from :
ii gsfonts 5.10a-2
to version :
ii gsfonts 6.0-2
hopefully, that was all.
Don't know if i'm right but there should be a dependancy for gsfonts and gs in
tetex-bin package : neither xdvi nor dvips can correctly operate without a good
gs/gsfonts installation. There is only a "Suggests gs" in tetex-bin and a
"Recommends psfonts" in gs.
--
Davy Gigan
System & Network Administration [Please no HTML, I'm not a browser]
University Of Caen (France) [Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un navigateur]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 130755-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2004 08:29:55 +0000
>From hille42@web.de Mon Nov 15 00:29:54 2004
Return-path: <hille42@web.de>
Received: from smtp07.web.de [217.72.192.225]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CTcFG-0004Qu-00; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 00:29:54 -0800
Received: from [212.14.71.206] (helo=preusse.amasol.de)
by smtp07.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.102 #165)
id 1CTcEl-0005JI-00
for 130755-done@bugs.debian.org; Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:24 +0100
Received: by preusse.amasol.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:23 +0100
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 09:29:23 +0100
From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
To: 130755-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#130755: tetex-{bin,base,extra} dependancy problem
Message-ID: <20041115082923.GD1156@preusse>
References: <87smfjpu17.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <87smfjpu17.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: CYGWIN_NT-5.0 1.5.11(0.116/4/2) i686
X-Face: .n=jHnz:2pu0c0)ef]4O#1FE{Vak?h89!g7_#2+PzSRoIU[pJFNnz>gLhn}UMwv}4/j{X.. 2E+>U>P!`PYk
X-Confirmation-Request: yes
X-Confirm-Reading-To: "Hilmar Preusse" <hille42@web.de>
Sender: hille42@web.de
X-Sender: hille42@web.de
Delivered-To: 130755-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On 04.04.04 Frank Küster (frank@kuesterei.ch) wrote:
Hi *,
> two years ago you have made a bug report against the teTeX packages in
> Debian. We apologize that we haven't answered to it. Right now we're
> trying to work through old bugs, and came across yours.
>
> You say that there were problems in xdvi and dvips without having recent
> versions of gs and gsfonts installed. Can you still remember (or in the
> best case, reproduce) these problems more specifically?
>
<snip>
>
> I would be very glad to hear from you, whether you are still interested
> in that bug, and we should investigate it, or just close it.
>
No reaction for half a year. Closing.
H.
--
sigmentation fault
Reply to: