Re: Bug#231235: arabtex font installation is broken
> If it doesn't work well, this is bad for anyone installing arabtex from
> unstable on his woody system. But this is tolerable, if Clint doesn't
> manage (or want) to handle both situations. You should document in
> README.Debian that the missing dependency on tetex>=2 is only to ensure
> a smooth upgrade.
>
> Clint, are you still tuned in?
Yes. So I should either version the tetex-extra dependency to (>=2) or
unversion the tetex-base dependency and expand the postinst to run
mktexlsr if update-updmap is unavailable?
Reply to: