Bug#229725: marked as done (tetex-base: Missing conflicts)
Your message dated Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:52:37 +0100
with message-id <[🔎] 87isikbkm2.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
and subject line Bug#228926: marked as done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2004 08:02:27 +0000
>From kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de Mon Jan 26 00:02:26 2004
Return-path: <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de>
Received: from mrelay2.uni-hannover.de [130.75.2.5]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Al1hS-0001jl-00; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 00:02:26 -0800
Received: from mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (mail.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.242])
by mrelay2.uni-hannover.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0Q82IGm025831
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:20 +0100 (MET)
Received: from arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de (arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de [130.75.25.96])
by mail.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1783FD17D
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: by arctur.itp.uni-hannover.de (Postfix, from userid 237)
id EB33A6B85; Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:06 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 09:02:06 +0100
From: Helge Kreutzmann <kreutzm@itp.uni-hannover.de>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: tetex-base: Missing conflicts
Message-ID: <20040126080206.GB14828@itp.uni-hannover.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm/data/kreutzm.gpg
X-homepage: http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreutzm
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_25
X-Spam-Level:
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: tetex-base
Version: 1.0.2+20011202-2
Severity: normal
Upgrading tetex-base failed:
versuche =BB/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config=AB zu =FCberschreiben, welches
auch in Paket arabtex ist
(english: trying to overwrite "/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config" which is
also in paket arabtex)
Removing arabtex by hand allowed me to install tetex-base.
I don't have a woody changeroot at hand right now, but the easiest way
to check this would be to creat a woody changeroot, install
tetex+arabtex and upgrade to unstable. If that works, than simply
close this bug (sorry for being unable to test that right now myself).
Btw. installing arabtex afterwards worked flawlessly.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: alpha
Kernel: Linux sixtyfor 2.4.21-pre1 #1 Don Okt 2 18:27:25 CEST 2003 alpha
Locale: LANG=3Dde_DE@euro, LC_CTYPE=3Dde_DE@euro
Versions of packages tetex-base depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.18 Package maintenance system for=
Deb
ii texinfo 4.1-2 Documentation system for on-li=
ne i
--=20
Helge Kreutzmann, Dipl.-Phys. Helge.Kreutzmann@itp.uni-hannov=
er.de
gpg signed mail preferred gpg-key: finger kreutzm@rigel.itp.uni-hannov=
er.de
64bit GNU powered http://www.itp.uni-hannover.de/~kreu=
tzm
Help keep free software "libre": http://www.freepatents.org/
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQFAFMl+RsxcY/MYpWoRAuwzAJ9xvzpu0mQJE8u1Jt+eV5mm8zbutgCeJpGZ
+KTCodzfgilA8ZD/iEbsqks=
=avJK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aVD9QWMuhilNxW9f--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 229725-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 09:53:40 +0000
>From frank@kuesterei.ch Fri Feb 06 01:53:40 2004
Return-path: <frank@kuesterei.ch>
Received: from balu1.urz.unibas.ch [131.152.1.51]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ap2g7-0006vd-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 01:53:39 -0800
Received: from alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch (bioz6-allgem17.bioz.unibas.ch [131.152.17.45])
by balu1.urz.unibas.ch (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i169r4Qd006410;
Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:53:07 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch)
by alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Ap2f7-0001Lb-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:52:37 +0100
To: debian-tetex-maint@lists.debian.org
Cc: 229725-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#228926: marked as done
Sender: frank.kuester@unibas.ch
X-Attribution: fant
X-Ehrenamt: http://www.langau.de
From: frank@kuesterei.ch (=?iso-8859-15?q?Frank_K=FCster?=)
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 20040205155230.GA7760@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de> (Hilmar
Preusse's message of "Thu, 5 Feb 2004 16:52:30 +0100")
References: <20040121183902.GA6312@alcor.net>
<[🔎] handler.228926.D228926.107594487822676.ackdone@bugs.debian.org>
<[🔎] 20040205111700.GA1025@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
<[🔎] 20040205.225640.-1300515633.kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp>
<[🔎] 20040205155230.GA7760@preusse-16223.user.cis.dfn.de>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 10:52:37 +0100
Message-ID: <[🔎] 87isikbkm2.fsf@alhambra.bioz.unibas.ch>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: 229725-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de> schrieb:
> On 05.02.04 Atsuhito Kohda (kohda@pm.tokushima-u.ac.jp) wrote:
>> From: Hilmar Preusse <hille42@web.de>
>
> Hi all,
>
>> > * Added arabtex (<=3D 3.10-5) to Conflicts: entry. [kohda]
>> >=20
>> > IMHO that line belongs to tetex-base. It doesn't hurt in tetex-bin,
>> > but it doesn't really belong to here.
>>=20
>> Hmm, stupid mistake... Thanks.
>>=20
>> By the way, could we close #229725 with that Conflicts=20
>> in tetex-base ?
>>=20
> As far as I understood the discussion in "lmodern and sarge": yes.
> Frank?
Yes, I'm closing.
Regards, Frank
--=20
Frank K=FCster, Biozentrum der Univ. Basel
Abt. Biophysikalische Chemie
Reply to: