[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Testing removal summary 2006-12-03 (Sunday)



The following source package(s) have been removed from testing:

  REMOVED: gnome-gv 1:2.12.0-2
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #384226: RM: gnome-gv -- RoQA; orphaned, dead upstream, better alternatives

  REMOVED: honyaku-el 1.02-8
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #392901: RM: honyaku-el -- RoQA; "essentially useless", orphaned, very few users

  REMOVED: radiuscontext 1.88-2
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #279592: RM: radiuscontext -- RoQA; very few users, orphaned since 2004, obsolete w/r/t upstream

  REMOVED: rsplib 1.0.0-6
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #340940: RM: rsplib -- RoQA; orphaned, out of date w/r/t upstream, very few users

  REMOVED: zope-docfindereverywhere 0.4.1-2
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #400729: RM: zope-docfindereverywhere -- RoM; unmaintained upstream, superseeded by zope-docfindertab

The following package(s) appear to have valid removal hints,
but are still in testing for some reason:

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: initrd-tools 0.1.84.1
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #395181: missing dependency on libdevmapper1.01

  HINTED FOR REMOVAL: xen-unstable 3.0-unstable+hg11561-1
    <http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/hints/luk>
    Bug #395332: xen-unstable - not suitable for a release

The script that generates this mail tries to extract removal
reasons from comments in the britney hint files. Those comments
were not originally meant to be machine readable, so if the
reason for removing your package seems to be nonsense, it is
probably the reporting script that got confused. Please check the
actual hints file before you complain about meaningless removals.

-- 
This email is automatically generated; henning@makholm.net is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.



Reply to: