Re: kernel-package sparc confusion
On Tue, 7 Oct 2003 18:05:05 -0400, Rob Radez <rob@osinvestor.com> said:
> On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 01:53:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>> The logic I wanted was, if KPKG_SUBARCH is set, leave it. If it is
>> unset, set it according to "uname -m" (that is sparc32 for "uname
>> == sparc" and sparc64 for "uname == sparc64").
> Unfortunately, it's not doing that right now. With KPKG_SUBARCH
> unset by me, it's getting set to sparc64 by kernel-package on my
> sparc32 machines. I'll look into a proper patch soon if no one else
> does.
Thanks. I hesitate to apply patches to kenel-package that I
can't test, so this would help a lot.
manoj
--
Would you care to drift aimlessly in my direction?
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: