Re: A small question

[Ardo van Rangelrooij <arangelrooij@lucent.com>]

Hi,

[snip from Adam]
> Well, sgml-tools (v1) does a lot of things in what I would consider a
> messed up way.  The pacakge is effectively orphaned, both upstream and
> in Debian.  Moreover, it ships and uses it's own wierd set of ISO
> entity sets.  Note there is no FPI for ISOLat1 etc in sgml-tools, but
> instead, in /etc/sgml.catalog:
> 
>   -- outdated and shared entities --
>   ENTITY %common            "../sgml/dtd/common"
>   ENTITY %isoent            "../sgml/dtd/isoent"

As a side note: debiandoc-sgml also has its own entity file from its
incarnation which is similar (if not the same) as the one sgml-tools
was using (when it was still called linuxsgml or something like that).

I have on my TODO list to remove it and use the "official" entity files
from sgml-data.  This seems a good time to do on this.  Is there a way
to identify which entity files to "include" in the DTD?

Thanks,
Ardo