Re: Out of office replies
On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 07:29, Frank Lanitz <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 07:15:30 -0500 "Jim Popovitch" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Bah!! Headers change over time. The simple and easy way to solve
>> OoO problems is for vacation responders to only reply to From:/Sender:
>> if (and only if) To: == $recipient.
> This will not work since you got e.g. in Exchange virtuell recipients
Virtual recipients shouldn't be a problem. The vacation responder
(no matter where it exist in the process) shouldn't respond if To: !=
$recipient (virtual recipient or not).
> and I know people that really likes to register on ML etc. with these
> addresses on the one hand and setting these messages on the other side.
I fail to see how that figures into the OoO equation. MLs *don't*
want OoO replies. ;-)
> To avoid such things the first step needs to be done on user side e.g.
> forcing them to create folders for lists and setting such rules only
> folder wide.