[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: policy change is needed to keep debian secure



Daniel Sterling wrote:
> Keeping Debian stable by not changing things is great.
> 
> Except maybe its not so great when you're trying to maintain a complicated,
> buggy, high profile program that handles sensitive user data and untrusted input.
> 
> Debian stable cannot stay stable without changing, sometimes drastically.
> 
> Firefox in Debian stable cannot stay stable and secure by not changing.
> ...

This issue has been done to death already.  Please read the archives of
this list, especially one of Matt Zimmerman's posts in the "On Mozilla-*
updates" thread, which reads in part:

>>The solution to this problem is simple.  We change the meaning of stable
>>> to "stable except for such cases as security demands upgrading versions
>>> rather than backporting patches."
>>>...
> 
> Did you realize before this rant that this is already the policy, and has
> been documented in the Security Team FAQ for several years now?

-- 
Paul
<http://paulgear.webhop.net>
--
Did you know?  Email addresses can be forged easily.  This message is
signed with GNU Privacy Guard <http://www.gnupg.org> and Enigmail
<http://enigmail.mozdev.org> so you can be sure it comes from me.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: