[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [OT] tales (was: woody kernel image)



Greetings,

Am Sonntag, 30. Januar 2005 22:46 schrieb Alexander Schmehl:
> * Jan Lühr <jluehr@gmx.net> [050130 22:13]:
> > Don't take it down personal. Jugding about DSA's I've seen, there is
> > currently _no_ security-support for 2.4.18.
>
> I didn't made any statement about security support of 2.4.18.  All I
> said was, that MK can't proof her own statement, that I can't a find a
> proof of it, and that we have a hint, contradicting her statement.

yeah, yeah, yeah, please stop this flamewar.

> > For reasons I don't know, for thinks, I  don't understand, important
> > patches seem to be missing.  If you have information about the status
> > of sec-sup in 2.4.18 please let us know.
>
> Did you read the mail from Joey Schulze forwarded by Jan Minar a couple
> of hours ago to this list?  Security support for 2.4.18 kernels has not
> been dropped.  It isn't nice, that the kernel-packages has not been
> upgraded, yet.  But I'm sure, that the Security Team will gladly accept
> your help, if you send them working and tested patches.

ACK, support hasn't been dropped officialy and Joey is doing a good job 
patching 2.4.27 - and I'm the last one complaining about not riding dead 
horses like old stable packages, as soon as packages can be backported from 
sid easily. (In other situtations - no I won't mention the m***** word it is 
different).
However, Imho users should be warned, that using woody is a security risk.

Keep smiling
yanosz 



Reply to: