Re: SSH

To: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>
Cc: Debian Security <debian-security@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: SSH
From: Andrew Mulholland <andy@xinitsystems.com>
Date: 17 Dec 2002 12:02:57 +0000
Message-id: <1040126577.10227.5.camel@pindakaas.gateway.corp.xinitsystems.com>
In-reply-to: <1040119537.1320.29.camel@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch>
References: <20021216225215.GA5610@zionlth.org> <20021216232417.GA9640@jazzman> <1040119537.1320.29.camel@altfrangg.fortytwo.ch>

On Tue, 2002-12-17 at 10:05, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> 
> Well, SSH1 is still vulnerable. It's nothing to do with the current
> advisory. So the advice not to run SSH1 is still valid.
> 

does this affect the ssh1 option in OpenSSH?
(as in on a woody/sarge box, running OpenSSH, if I've the ssh1 option
enabled, am I vulnerable? :)

thanks

-- 
Andrew Mulholland <andy@xinitsystems.com>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SSH
  - From: Edward Guldemond <thedebategod@yifan.net>

References:
- SSH
  - From: Phillip Hofmeister <plhofmei@zionlth.org>
- Re: SSH
  - From: Edward Guldemond <thedebategod@yifan.net>
- Re: SSH
  - From: Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <avbidder@fortytwo.ch>

Prev by Date: Re: Bad Signature (was: Re: SSH)
Next by Date: Re: Bug #173254 Submitted: Snort In Stable "Unusable"
Previous by thread: Re: SSH
Next by thread: Re: SSH
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread