Re: Ports to block?

To: "Eric N. Valor" <eric.valor@lutris.com>
Cc: Brandon High <armitage@freaks.com>, debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Ports to block?
From: J C Lawrence <claw@kanga.nu>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 19:05:12 -0700
Message-id: <3047.986522712@kanga.nu>
In-reply-to: Message from "Eric N. Valor" <eric.valor@lutris.com> of "Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:40:54 PDT." <4.3.2.7.2.20010405133235.038ed750@10.10.40.54>
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20010405133235.038ed750@10.10.40.54>

On Thu, 05 Apr 2001 13:40:54 -0700 
Eric N Valor <eric.valor@lutris.com> wrote:

> 53-UDP (DNS, if you have bind running)

DNS will talk TCP on port 53 if the record requested is particularly
large.

-- 
J C Lawrence                                       claw@kanga.nu
---------(*)                          http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/
--=| A man is as sane as he is dangerous to his environment |=--

Reply to:

References:
- Re: Ports to block?
  - From: "Eric N. Valor" <eric.valor@lutris.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Ports to block?
Next by Date: Re: Ports to block?
Previous by thread: Re: port 111.
Next by thread: sendmail and NOQUEUE: Null connection from root@localhost in log files
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread