Re: DSA-1681-1 vs. tracker

To: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>
Cc: debian-security-tracker@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: DSA-1681-1 vs. tracker
From: Moritz Muehlenhoff <jmm@inutil.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 22:16:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20081204211621.GA3605@galadriel.inutil.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20081204215925.dd010292.frx@firenze.linux.it>
References: <[🔎] 20081204215925.dd010292.frx@firenze.linux.it>

> The DSA [1] claims that all the CVEs are fixed in etch by
> linux-2.6.24/2.6.24-6~etchnhalf.7, while the tracker pages for
> CVE-2008-5134 [3] and CVE-2008-5182 [4] claim that etch is still vulnerable.

Fixed.

Cheers,
        Moritz

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: DSA-1681-1 vs. tracker
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>

References:
- DSA-1681-1 vs. tracker
  - From: Francesco Poli <frx@firenze.linux.it>

Prev by Date: geshi vs. tracker
Next by Date: Re: geshi vs. tracker
Previous by thread: DSA-1681-1 vs. tracker
Next by thread: Re: DSA-1681-1 vs. tracker
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread