Re: linux-2.6 records
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 08:13:44PM +0000, Micah Anderson wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 19:53:27 +0100, Nico Golde wrote:
> > Hi Maximilian,
> > * maximilian attems <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2007-12-17
> > 23:10]:
> >> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
> >> > Thanks very much for letting us know, I marked the reported CVE ids
> >> > as fixed in the reported versions.
> >> thanks a lot!
> >> ok now easier to go through, state better then thought :)
> >> CVE-2006-7051
> >> d02479bdeb1c9b037892061cdcf4e730183391fa v2.6.23-rc4 2.6.23-1
> >> CVE-2007-3731
> >> a10d9a71bafd3a283da240d2868e71346d2aef6f v2.6.23-rc1 2.6.23-1
> > Marked those as fixed in the tracker, thanks again! Cheers
> > Nico
> I'm confused... kernel issues are being tracked outside of this security
> tracker, in their own per-issue tracker located in the kernel team's SVN
> repository. Primarily dannf and jmm have been updating those. For what
> reason are we starting to track these in the tracker now?
The unstable status has always been tracked with the linux-2.6 source
package, only the other kernels (like 2.6.8) are only tracked in the
I'm merging the data every now and then.