Re: Bug#247989: O: rdoc -- Generate documentation from ruby source files
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 01:10:04PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
> Is there still a point to keeping the rdoc package around? It looks like
> it depends on Ruby 1.8, so it's equivalent to the rdoc1.8 package. If
> this is the case, I would suggest just removing rdoc and maybe renaming
> rdoc1.8 to rdoc.
Well as I exspect ri to drag ri1.8 along, and ruby ruby1.8 because it's
just the current version, I was already confused that there was not
an rdoc virtual package.
So I would suggest to make this the same as all other ruby related
binary packages. A rdoc dummy package depending on rdoc1.8.
I believe this isn't mentioned in the Ruby Policy though, only for
Student @ Eindhoven | JID: firstname.lastname@example.org
University of Technology, The Netherlands | email: email@example.com
>>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG: finger firstname.lastname@example.org