Re: Comments regarding libcitadel_8.14-1_amd64.changes
On Fri, 2012-08-17 at 13:02 +0200, Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 09:45:14PM +0000, Luca Falavigna wrote:
> > If you think your package should be targeted Wheezy, please let Release Team
> > know and discuss with them about the best way to handle the transition. If that
> > is not the case, your package will be processed after Wheezy release. If you
> > want to give it broader testing, there is another option: we can reject it from
> > the NEW queue, and let you upload it to experimental instead.
> Well, release team knows that this package was supposed to make it into Wheezy
> to fix the incorrect major version number in the library. Release team, could
> you please tell us what to do? Do you consider letting libcitadel3 and the
> corresponding citadel/webcit packages into Wheezy? If so, we should get it out
> of NEW. If not, do we release with the buggy version?
Does 8.14-1 contain any changes beyond the SONAME change and
corresponding library package rename?