Your message dated Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:46:57 +0200 with message-id <20120720004657.3d50ac43@sk2.org> and subject line Re: Bug#680647: unblock: binutils-mingw-w64/2 has caused the Debian Bug report #680647, regarding unblock: binutils-mingw-w64/2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 680647: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=680647 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: binutils-mingw-w64/2
- From: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
- Date: Sat, 07 Jul 2012 18:32:15 +0200
- Message-id: <20120707163215.31509.76559.reportbug@heffalump.sk2.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package binutils-mingw-w64: it drops a erroneous Conflicts relationship with mingw32-binutils, which is required to allow mingw32-ocaml upgrades from squeeze using apt-get (see #662746 for details). The diff is as follows: diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index e6866ff..056d74d 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +binutils-mingw-w64 (2) unstable; urgency=low + + * binutils-mingw-w64 doesn't conflict with mingw32-binutils so remove + the relationship (helps with #662746). + + -- Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> Wed, 04 Jul 2012 22:54:01 +0200 + binutils-mingw-w64 (1) unstable; urgency=low [ Stephen Kitt ] diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control index 9ec7885..39dcbab 100644 --- a/debian/control +++ b/debian/control @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ Package: binutils-mingw-w64 Architecture: all Depends: ${misc:Depends}, binutils-mingw-w64-i686, binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64 Built-Using: binutils (= ${binutils:Version}) -Conflicts: mingw32-binutils Description: Cross-binutils for Win32 and Win64 using MinGW-w64 MinGW-w64 provides a development and runtime environment for 32- and 64-bit (x86 and x64) Windows applications using the Windows API and @@ -25,7 +24,6 @@ Package: binutils-mingw-w64-i686 Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, binutils (>= ${local:Version}) Built-Using: binutils (= ${binutils:Version}) -Conflicts: mingw32-binutils Breaks: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1) Replaces: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1) Description: Cross-binutils for Win32 (x86) using MinGW-w64 @@ -39,7 +37,6 @@ Package: binutils-mingw-w64-x86-64 Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, binutils (>= ${local:Version}) Built-Using: binutils (= ${binutils:Version}) -Conflicts: mingw32-binutils Breaks: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1) Replaces: binutils-mingw-w64 (<< 2.22-1+1) Description: Cross-binutils for Win64 (x64) using MinGW-w64 unblock binutils-mingw-w64/2 Regards, Stephen -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 680647-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#680647: unblock: binutils-mingw-w64/2
- From: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:46:57 +0200
- Message-id: <20120720004657.3d50ac43@sk2.org>
- In-reply-to: <20120707163215.31509.76559.reportbug@heffalump.sk2.org>
- References: <20120707163215.31509.76559.reportbug@heffalump.sk2.org>
On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 18:32:15 +0200, Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> wrote: > Please unblock package binutils-mingw-w64: it drops a erroneous > Conflicts relationship with mingw32-binutils, which is required to > allow mingw32-ocaml upgrades from squeeze using apt-get (see #662746 > for details). I'm closing this since KiBi unblocked the package (thanks!) and it has successfully transitioned to testing. Regards, StephenAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---