Re: Migration of emboss and embassy-* to testing?
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:33:40PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Apologies for the delay in getting back to you about this.
No problem - I guess you have some other stuff to do as well ...
> On Thu, 2012-07-05 at 08:55 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > I admit I can not make any sense out of the numbers you are mentioning
> > above but the reason embassy-phylip becomes obvious.
> They're the number of uninstallable packages per architecture; the key
> difference is the change from "a-0" to "a-1" indicating the newly
> installable (if the hint had succeeded) package on amd64.
Thanks for the explanation.
> Dropping the most obvious build noise from the diff together with what
> could charitably be claimed as "documentation fixes" leaves a reasonably
> small set of changes. Given that the package is in non-free, I've
> unblocked it and hoped nothing breaks; if it does, we might then lean
> towards removal rather than another unblock.
That's the perfect solution for us - many thanks