On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > As I already said elsewhere, bumping debhelper and enabling multiarch is > what I consider invasive changes, with possible breakages in the reverse > dependencies, which one might only notice long after they are > introduced. Even for the sake of getting rid of ia32-libs, that seems > way too late for me. What if these changes could be done without a debhelper bump? The lesstif2 patch is not bumping debhelper (see attached), and #680887 in openjpeg could have been solved in a different way that would not have bumped debhelper (the arch-dependent files could be excluded from dh_stripping). I'm trying to be as reactive as I can about breakages I cause (although I admit that 've been too trigger-happy with openjpeg and I'll not do that anymore), and we have quite a bit of time until the release (looking at 650 rc bugs right now). Best wishes, Mike
Attachment:
lesstif2_multiarch.diff
Description: Binary data