[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#681398: marked as done (release.debian.org: maintainer (both Debian and upstream lost intrest) see #627174)

Your message dated Tue, 17 Jul 2012 14:32:25 +0200
with message-id <20120717123225.GE18346@spike.0x539.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#681398: release.debian.org: maintainer (both Debian and upstream lost intrest) see #627174
has caused the Debian Bug report #681398,
regarding release.debian.org: maintainer (both Debian and upstream lost intrest) see #627174
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
681398: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681398
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

The Debian/upstream maintainer says:

"SD has fallen from my priorities, and to have it be worth keeping in
Debian at this point, I think someone else will need to step up and work
on maintenance upstream."

I've asked in #debian-perl but noone has expressed an interest so I propose removing it.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 09:46:01PM +0100, Nicholas Bamber wrote:
> The Debian/upstream maintainer says:
> 
> "SD has fallen from my priorities, and to have it be worth keeping in
> Debian at this point, I think someone else will need to step up and work
> on maintenance upstream."
> 
> I've asked in #debian-perl but noone has expressed an interest so I propose
> removing it.

I've added a removal hint based on #627174. As Adam said: If nobody cares about
it remaining in Debian, it should also be removed from unstable.

If somebody steps up and fixes #627174 it can also be readded to testing, if
it's within 20 days of the removal.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: