Bug#681446: marked as done (unblock: botan1.10/1.10.3-1)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:27:52 +0100
with message-id <1342456072.3728.18.camel@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681446: unblock: botan1.10/1.10.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681446,
regarding unblock: botan1.10/1.10.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
681446: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=681446
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: botan1.10/1.10.3-1
- From: Ondřej Surý <ondrej@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 10:23:33 +0200
- Message-id: <20120713082333.31513.89511.reportbug@localhost6.localdomain6>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package botan1.10
ABI breakage in upstream 1.10.2, see #681066
unblock botan1.10/1.10.3-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sat, 2012-07-14 at 14:33 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 6:45 PM, Adam D. Barratt
> <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:
> > On 13.07.2012 09:23, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> >>
> >> Please unblock package botan1.10
> >>
> >> ABI breakage in upstream 1.10.2, see #681066
> >
> >
> > Do you know if any of the reverse dependencies were built against the broken
> > version and would need rebuilding?
>
> Good question. botan1.10 have only two rev B-D and softhsm was uploaded way
> before 1.10.2 hit the archive.
>
> Same applies to monotone.
>
> So, I would say none as an answer to your question.
Okay, thanks. Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: