On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:04:32PM +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote: > On 2012-06-19 12:26:39, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 11:20:30 +0100, Marcin Kulisz wrote: > > > I'd like to upload (not personally but by my sponsor [thx Matthijs btw]) new > > > version of pqxx (postgresql bindings for C++) to unstable. I'm putting urgency > > > to medium to make it before freeze. > > Are you kidding? What do you think the point of the urgency field is? > As an answer I'll ask you if those questions are rhetorical? If they are not > I'll try to answer them. > To answer your 1st question answer is no. Answer to your 2nd question is 'I > think so' as DP is not very complicated in this case. > Is it satisfactory for you? No. His question was "What do you think the point of the urgency field is?" and "I think so" is not a valid reply to that one. > > > Maintainers of the packages dependant on libpqxx have been asked to try it as > > > it has been upload to experimental some time ago. > > > Therefore I'm hoping everything is ok and that release team has no objections > > > to above. > > No, this is very much not OK. The time for such requests ended at least > > a month ago. > In this case what are you suggesting me/us to do, as freeze is not there yet? It feels very cold already. It will be here really soon now. Given that your package contains an ABI bump it's a transition and the deadline for those has passed already, sorry. Kind regards Philipp Kern
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature