Re: versioned tiff uploaded to experimental
Julien Cristau <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 09:56:58 -0500, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
>> Do I have to do anything to ask for all tiff reverse dependencies to be
>> automatically rebuild (other than mentioning it here)? I expect the
>> uploads within half an hour.
> I'll take care of this once the new version is in testing. I set up
> http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/libtiff4-symbols.html so we
> can track what's left.
> BTW, in version number comparisons '>' confusingly means greater or
> equal (and is deprecated for that reason), so I suspect the shlibs
> should really say >= 3.9.5-3 or >= 3.9.6 to also account for the
> 3.9.5-2+b2 binary NMU on armhf. Doesn't matter much anyway, 3.9.5-2
> is greater than the stable version, just thought I'd mention it.
Oops, yeah, I knew that at one time and had forgotten. I made the same
mistake in the control file, but lintian caught it. I updated my notes
for shlibs files to remind myself for the future.
Jay Berkenbilt <email@example.com>