Re: please review/accept patch against fail2ban 0.8.4-3 in stable
On Sat, 2012-02-18 at 13:44 -0500, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > > Major change is to deal with grave:
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=650678
> > #554162 was a more useful reference there, imho.
> > > (quilt)) suggested NMU
> > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635746
> > Likewise #544232, as the newer bug is purely about the suggested NMU,
> > not what the actual problem was.
> so -- in general -- should I list all of them as well (even those closed
> and archived in sid)? ignorantly I thought that it should be still open
> squeeze-tagged bug reports...
For the changelog, open bugs would be okay, particularly if the others
are archived. I mostly meant in terms of referencing the bugs in your
mail to the list.