Nicolas Bourdaud <firstname.lastname@example.org> (17/02/2012): > I am not sure but I think the parameters used on the transition page > lead to several false positives (or false bads): > > the tail of the criteria for being good is: > [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2debian/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4debian/ > the tail of the criteria for being bad is: > [...] | .depends ~ /libusb2/ | .depends ~ /libusbhid4/ > > So all packages that already depend on libusb2debian or libusbhid4debian > as they should are classified as bad packages. > > Again, I am not sure, I might have missed some details since it is the > first transition I take part. But from what I see, the parameters should > be corrected. Current parameters aren't too good: Some packages were missing, so I decided to widen the search perimeter but was in a hurry so stuff needs fixing. That will be tweaked later on. Mraw, KiBi.
Description: Digital signature